Visit Captain Sim web site  
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
 25 another company 4.6 (Read 21881 times)
wims
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 118
Joined: Jul 1st, 2010
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #15 - Nov 17th, 2011 at 6:59pm
Print Post  
Its very unfortunate for the people who have "bought the cat in the sack" as we say here in Norway. Have any of the another company customers tried to contact another company about this issue? What do they have to say about it? another company is the legal entity you have a contract with and technically those are the people you should bugger about it. Perhaps they will be more forthcoming when it comes to stating the reason for them not being able to provide a patch for the (arguably broken) product they sell
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #16 - Nov 17th, 2011 at 7:34pm
Print Post  
The second post in this thread gives a response from another company. Raul has posted it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
in2secs
New Member
Offline



Posts: 3
Joined: Jul 11th, 2010
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #17 - Nov 21st, 2011 at 12:38pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Our 757 agreement with another company is over. Therefore we do/will not provide any further updates on the boxed version of the 757.


That is not the best possible answer.

I understand this but what has this to do with me as a customer? Legally it does not really matter where I bought the product, it still is yours and you still cached in your royalties. The box states (C) Captain Sim 2008. Just imagine Mercedes or Toyata giving a statement like that because they cancelled one of their vendors agreements.

I am a software development manager - my work is judged by how efficiently I deliver solutions to our customers, not by how smart my excuses are for failing to do so.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #18 - Nov 21st, 2011 at 2:27pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Legally it does not really matter where I bought the product.

Yes it does. It's the 'CS 757 box sold by another company', so e. g. refunds and things like a guarantee can only be processed by another company.

While I personally don't know why the update channel was separated for download and (another company) box customers and, like you, raise an eyebrow on the image damage it causes, the legal side is defined in the contract between another company and CS alone. We don't know that contract, but it's no new 2011 thing to define different service and update channels in regard to e. g. software products or versions of them.
I don't applaud to such policies, but, legally, they aren't a problem.
The product's name does not act as a valid indicator of any legal background.

From your car example, I think you generalise some aspects there, which can't be summed up easily. Even a car manufacturer can refuse certain services when you've bought the car in another country (maybe with far higher taxes, so the car's price itself was much lower) and want to operate it with full legal coverage in the other one.
Product liability will be in place all over the planet, but certain update, guarantee and service aspects may indeed be limited, even if your car has the same name as the one from your neighbour.

So as much as I don't like to see the another company box owners being stuck with 4.4, the legal side of all that is very fixed and valid in my eyes. It would be nice to see another company and/or CS taking a step towards those people of course.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Vaegat
New Member
Offline



Posts: 1
Joined: Nov 21st, 2011
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #19 - Nov 21st, 2011 at 6:43pm
Print Post  
Hi all,

I have to agree on the legal position - for the boxed product, the contract you have is not with Captain Sim (in fact I don't think the publisher Just Flight has a legal obligation to you either); you do have a contract with the retailer.

Having said that, in the last 30 years of computer use, I don't think I've ever come across a situation quite like this and I'm very disappointed in both Just Flight and Captain Sim.  I've just returned to Flight Sim after many years where I've simply been too busy with work and family.  I decided to get some add-ons this time (in the past I've only used the default and freeware aircraft), and I tend to like a boxed product (and manual); maybe I'm just old fashioned.

I've never bought a piece of software either games or productivity where the updates (if any) are not freely offered (except for a clear change in version whereby the product is marketed as version 2.0, 3.0).  This doesn't even parallel corporate software purchasing (where you invariably do pay for an ongoing support contract) - in such a case, where the original vendor/publisher is unable to support the product any longer, the developer would ordinarily be thrilled to continue support (for a fee), but that isn't even possible here (without buying the same thing a second time).

Based on this experience, I didn't think to check whether a boxed product would be supported or not (I bought from Amazon, so I didn't see the statement on the Just Flight site saying that they only went up to version 4.4 until I went looking for updates), nor had I read Captain Sim's reasons for not supporting boxed products until after the purchase.  I know many will say here that I should have checked - I would have had there been any indication that there were different products.

So now I have bought two Captain Sim products and feel let down by both companies another company & CS (I got 757 and 727 Captain).  Obviously I know now that the only way to buy Captain Sim stuff is direct, but with the bad taste this has left in my mouth, I'm not sure I would be willing to buy either company's products in the future.

Sorry for the rant, will stop now and rant no more! Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #20 - Nov 22nd, 2011 at 12:39am
Print Post  
I didn't read your stuff as ranting. In fact
Quote:
So now I have bought two Captain Sim products and feel let down by both companies another company & CS

sounds very reasonable to me.

And this
Quote:
but with the bad taste this has left in my mouth, I'm not sure I would be willing to buy either company's products in the future.

should actually be the wake up call for everybody trying to attract people and making them customers. Well, maybe the sales around Christmas help a bit though.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
joc
New Member
Offline



Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 24th, 2011
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #21 - Nov 24th, 2011 at 8:27pm
Print Post  
Hi,

feel abandoned again.
1st there was fs9 update 2.2 only download (another company was told fs9 was not supported anymore). So i switched over to fsx. Now i read that fsx boxed version is also not supported by any updates Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry
What about the other CS products sold by another company?
Twice is enough.
Goodbye CS!!!!!

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rservice
Beta Team
*
Offline



Posts: 373
Location: Canada
Joined: Apr 17th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #22 - Nov 24th, 2011 at 9:33pm
Print Post  
Sorry guy,YOU bought the product from another company, NOT CS,so the consequencies are that CS is not responsible.This may be a tough pill to swallow,but I have to say that CS supports their own customers very well,probably bettter than most other developers out there.So,you may have your reasons for wanting a boxed product,but CS only markets THEIR  product on a download basis.That's just the way it is Cheesy
Ron
  

Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
windycityflyer
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 77
Joined: Apr 9th, 2011
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #23 - Nov 24th, 2011 at 10:01pm
Print Post  
Feel sorry for these paying customers...caught in the middle...it appears both another company and CS have proved themeselves to be rather "myopic" in their mutual contract negotiations w/o much concern for the long-term goodwill of their paying customers whose only mistake (by no means they should be faulted for this) was to buy the Boxed edition from a CS authorized (and supposedly reputable) retailer...

It's to be also noted that CS has needed two additional (free) upgrades to improve the 4.4 version to a generally acceptable and flyable state...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
joc
New Member
Offline



Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 24th, 2011
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #24 - Nov 26th, 2011 at 1:01pm
Print Post  
@rservice

CS have given another company permission to sell their product in a boxed version. (copyrighted 2008 CS as stated on the box). CS collects money for every sold boxed version too. so they are indirectly responsible.
If they aren't feelin' responsible they wouldn't have given any update to another company.
So for now, after having no more contract with another company, your statement "but CS...basis" will be true
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tf51d
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 273
Joined: Nov 9th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #25 - Nov 30th, 2011 at 7:04pm
Print Post  
I think the problem is logistical. Unless another company turns over their customer base who bought the 757 with order numbers to CS, which I doubt they have or will do, how can CS verify customer claims? There may be a way to build an interrogator in the update installer, to verify a valid customer, against another company's copyright protection scheme, but that may violate another company's copyrights. The only other way would be manual, the customer would have to send CS a copy of the email receipt from another company, which CS can verify ownership, but that will take resources that CS doesn't have or is not willing to provide. So there are no easy answers here, and the customer is caught in the middle.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
NNewcomb
Senior Member
*
Offline


757-200, 767-300, 727-100,
727-200, 727F, 737-200

Posts: 604
Location: United States
Joined: Jun 29th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #26 - Dec 3rd, 2011 at 2:27am
Print Post  
Captain Sim 2 wrote on Nov 14th, 2011 at 9:58pm:
Our 757 agreement with another company is over. Therefore we do/will not provide any further updates on the boxed version of the 757. Unfortunately there are no special discounts or free downloads for the boxed 757 customers. More info: http://www.captainsim.com/support/boxed.html


Does this apply with the 727 also? The 727 is the only boxed CS aircraft I have from another company. There are some issues in the boxed version that greatly limited the ability to use the airplane properly.
  

—Nick&&&&Dell Inspirion 15R | Intel Core i5 @ 2.5 Ghz (Up to 3.1Ghz) | 6GB DDR3 @ 1333Mhz | Intel Graphics HD 3000 | 750GB HDD | Windows 7 Home Premium
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DrNex
New Member
Offline



Posts: 1
Joined: Jun 7th, 2012
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #27 - Jun 7th, 2012 at 9:24pm
Print Post  
I have to say that I think this is really quite outrageous. I have never heard of any software developer refusing to update a legally purchased product based on the distribution channel.

Obviously Captain Sim agreed to have Just Flight publish its software some time ago. Whether they had a falling out is irrelevant, as they still have a duty to support the end user /purchaser of their product regardless of the distribution channel. They undoubtedly still receive royalties (or did receive royalties) for the purchase of this product, and to leave the user "hanging" without an update is extremely unprofessional. All this baloney about "supporting the developer" is hogwash - Captain Sim made a knowing and intelligent decision to publish via Just Flight, probably to get its product out to users who would otherwise not have heard of CS, myself included.

I was thinking of buying the 707 and 727 from Captain Sim, but with this kind of "customer service" I will stay far away. Other developers for FSX (without naming names) do not engage in this sort of unprofessional behavior which serves only to punish the end user. If CS has a problem with Just Flight, that is between CS and Just Flight. The end user should not be punished for this dispute, and CS should continue to support its product no matter what the distribution channel. If CS wants to stop publishing any of its future products through Just Flight, that's entirely CS's choice - but leaving the end user hanging is not only legally questionable, it's bad business. It would cost CS nothing to make their users happy (there is no variable cost associated with making the patch available to another company users, since it's not physical media) and instead they will lose business, at least certainly mine.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tf51d
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 273
Joined: Nov 9th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #28 - Jun 9th, 2012 at 2:10am
Print Post  
DrNex wrote on Jun 7th, 2012 at 9:24pm:
I have to say that I think this is really quite outrageous. I have never heard of any software developer refusing to update a legally purchased product based on the distribution channel.

Obviously Captain Sim agreed to have Just Flight publish its software some time ago. Whether they had a falling out is irrelevant, as they still have a duty to support the end user /purchaser of their product regardless of the distribution channel. They undoubtedly still receive royalties (or did receive royalties) for the purchase of this product, and to leave the user "hanging" without an update is extremely unprofessional. All this baloney about "supporting the developer" is hogwash - Captain Sim made a knowing and intelligent decision to publish via Just Flight, probably to get its product out to users who would otherwise not have heard of CS, myself included.


While I feel for you, the fact is you purchased the 757 from Just Flight, your purchase contract is with them not with CS. It is up to them to provide support via their contract with the developer. If they didn't make provisions in that contract for the developer to continue support to their end customer base after their contract lapsed, that is their problem. What is complicating the matter is they used a different purchasing mechanism then CS which CS does not have access to, so there is no way they can verify another company's customer base to provide the update (Which is actually a full installation.) So unfortunately another company's customers are left in the middle of this.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Justin Friedland
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 12
Joined: Dec 28th, 2008
Re: another company 4.6
Reply #29 - Aug 3rd, 2012 at 5:05pm
Print Post  
To all you jailhouse lawyers out there who are trying to quote contract law to make excuses for Captain Sim, how about we just focus on simple ethical behavior.
I own the boxed version of 757 Captain from Just Flight.  
Captain Sim’s name, copyright, “trademark Aircraft Configuration Editor” brag, and verbiage is all over that product.
You can assume that Captain Sim profited by either getting a piece of every unit sold by Just Flight, or else getting a pretty hefty licensing fee in the original deal that allowed Just Flight to box and sell the product.
For them to walk away from supporting the product just because they apparently couldn’t reach terms on an extension of that agreement in no way should absolve them from continuing to support the product that has their name on it.
And it does need support.  The 757 (my last and final purchase of a Captain Sim product ever) is, like most Captain Sim products, annoyingly flawed.  One only has to read the forums on any CS product (most notably the 727) to see that purchasers are constantly forced to either accept bad behavior by their purchases, or devise workarounds that should have been fixed by the manufacturer, the efforts of CoolP and Markoz notwithstanding.  
I own the 727, the C-130, the 707 and the 757.  Each of them requires more time and effort to fix, update, kludge and repair than to actually fly, which is why I say the 757 is my last CS purchase.  The support just isn’t there… and I'm done buying the hype that THE NEXT plane is really, really ready for the public.
CS has a great publicity machine that makes every new aircraft sound like the Second Coming.  Delivering on those promises is where they fall down.
But the real point here is that hundreds (thousands?) of us have purchased this product on the Captain Sim name, and for them to walk away under a pretense speaks volumes about their corporate ethos, and what you can expect in the future if you continue to deal with them.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board  ^Top