BrianG wrote on Dec 7^th, 2013 at 7:35pm:

I wouldn't say very shortly! But I certainly hope that's not too far off.

My concern for the 757 and 767 is that they have already said there will NOT be any more free upgrades. This means they are staying at v4.6 (757) and v1.5 (767). New versions are possibly on the cards for them, rather than bug fixes. In all honesty, I would rather see the bugs fixed on the current versions, rather than them being completely redone. Both the 757 and 767 are top of the line visually, and with the remaining bugs fixed, they would be top of the line across the board, or at least very close to it.

Hi, I am reading this now, and I feel there is no point doing a new version of the 57-67-77.
All three planes have a climb' that is not realistic - no 4-5000fpm at FL250
The climb is controlled by the elevator using the available thrust.
All three planes should capture the Stars wpts.
the 57-77 should have the descent path like my 67
Otherwise they are great.!

In an effort to see if it could make a difference, I removed Accel from my FSX and replaced with SP1 + SP2. No changes, all remain the same.  Did not gain, did not loose, except a few airplanes I never flown.

Honest, my 67 is so close !

Raymond     Boeing or nothing
KFLL      South florida  

The CS757 still beats all other 757's, IMHO.

With all the tweaks and adjustments in place, I find that it gives a comparable climb rates that are certainly close to what I'd expect from the "other" well known 757.
I return to the CS757 and CS737 time and time and time again. They're exceptional in every way, except in one respect: None are quite finished.
My wish is that CS will provide fixes for their 757, 767, & 777 rather than expect users to fix their ever-so-slightly-not-quite-there-yet aeroplanes.
Please CS, two New Year's resolutions: Issue final fixes for your products as clearly they need some fine tuning (flight dynamics and SID/STAR management) and please issue some regular news bulletins as once upon-a-time, I know that CS issued three updates within two months (or similar; Tim's review if I recall correctly mentioned this).
Once you update the current models, only then should you create new aircraft. I hate reading all the negative CS press and narratives in the "other" unofficial forum, although some of it, dare I say, appears justified.

BTW, is there an issue with your Navigraph raw data? For instance, the MELVO approach to MHTG Toncontin has spurious elements in it, which when removed and adjusted, allows the CS757 to fly the RNAV RW02 perfectly. On top of this, many ILS-X, Y, or Z approaches don't appear within the route after selection in the FMS, and this knocks out the TOD/VNAV profile, which leads me to suspect the data, only because the aircraft flies RNAV and VNAV without fault.

Hobestly CS, only you can fix this! Raise your profile to where it should be. Please consider issuing fixes for existing operational problems.

Also I have posted twice, some time ago in this forum, (those posts apparently vanished) asking for a classic former soviet plane. They are great.
How about the iconic IL-76. there are great models already, but no VC, no great panel. Some sort of partnership could be done with free developers for the body and dynamics, and CS could develop panel, VC and interiors. Even an occidental gauge version for Market reasons, I´m sure will be much appreciated by so many simmers and we will have some new for a change.