Visit Captain Sim web site  
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
2.2 works well...for me. (Read 3193 times)
tasev1
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 94
Location: Toronto
Joined: Feb 1st, 2006
Gender: Male
2.2 works well...for me.
Sep 12th, 2009 at 9:09pm
Print Post  
Just installed and did a complete flight from CYYZ to KTPA.  For the first time, I could do a complete flight without any major problems!!!! No CTD's, no strange and unusual behavior,  fuel planning was correct.

Thank you CS for making the FS9 version stable.

There are still a few small items that make me wonder, but none that are of any concern to me that take away from flying this aircraft.  This 757 is complete baby!

NOW I CAN GET MY MONEY'S WORTH!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cyclopian
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 58
Joined: Nov 13th, 2005
Re: 2.2 works well...for me.
Reply #1 - Sep 13th, 2009 at 12:03am
Print Post  
Let me add my voice to that!

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
amalishkin
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 28
Joined: Oct 29th, 2008
Re: 2.2 works well...for me.
Reply #2 - Sep 13th, 2009 at 3:12am
Print Post  
Before you get solid on your quote, do the follwoing test

http://www.captainsim.org/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1252743709

and lets us know how it goes for u.

tasev1 wrote on Sep 12th, 2009 at 9:09pm:
Just installed and did a complete flight from CYYZ to KTPA.  For the first time, I could do a complete flight without any major problems!!!! No CTD's, no strange and unusual behavior,  fuel planning was correct.

Thank you CS for making the FS9 version stable.

There are still a few small items that make me wonder, but none that are of any concern to me that take away from flying this aircraft.  This 757 is complete baby!

NOW I CAN GET MY MONEY'S WORTH!!

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tasev1
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 94
Location: Toronto
Joined: Feb 1st, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: 2.2 works well...for me.
Reply #3 - Sep 13th, 2009 at 4:38am
Print Post  
I was quite lightly loaded on my approach to Tampa (app spd 117, so that would have been around 140-160 Gross wt.).  During the arrival procedure, if it did oversteer I didn't notice it.  It overshot the track at one point and re-established ok but that's about it.

But what I DID notice is that roll rate for autopilot was high and it held 30 degrees bank rather than 25 deg like it should be.  The 757 is a VERY maneuverable jet so it is capable to roll quick, but for pax comfort 25 deg max bank is typical autopilot maximum.

Still, this is something I'm willing to live with for a working product.  CS may no longer work on the FS9 version, but one of us will have a good fix eventually.

Lets just be grateful CS listened and made a final update.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jlinares
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 66
Joined: Mar 5th, 2006
Re: 2.2 works well...for me.
Reply #4 - Sep 14th, 2009 at 12:45pm
Print Post  
And the VOR OBS on 2D panel works fine?

Regards.

Javier Linares
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tasev1
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 94
Location: Toronto
Joined: Feb 1st, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: 2.2 works well...for me.
Reply #5 - Sep 15th, 2009 at 1:48am
Print Post  
Haven't tested the VOR, but it was on the list I believe.  If you guys look at the list of fixes for this patch, it is quite disturbingly extensive - which goes to show why we needed this patch so badly.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kevinbebek
Full Member
*
Offline



Posts: 5
Joined: Sep 22nd, 2008
Re: 2.2 works well...for me.
Reply #6 - Sep 15th, 2009 at 10:55am
Print Post  
I have installed the upgrade and have been faced with some of the issues from the original.  GCTS - EGKK   approx 27000lbs.  Completed flight using only 4000lbs.   This subject was featured before and some manuel amendments were made in the Fuel flow in the CFG, but these changes seem to have been made with the new release, but the issue is back.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board  ^Top