A friend of mine sent me some screenshots of the competition's 777 VC, and from strictly an INTERIOR MODELING standpoint (since systems and other aspects cannot yet be compared), I think that CS has the upper hand. I know that there are still plenty of issues to be worked out (I have faith CS will fix them all), but I want to thank the folks at CS for providing the best looking T7 on the market. If you disagree with me that's fine, everyone is entitled to an opinion.

If you have issues with the plane, don't be childish and put them on this thread. This is simply my thanks to CS. However, more compliments are gladly accepted 

I wish they could increase the frame rates in the V/C I would be satisfied

They already shifted the PAX cabin to a separate model in order to squeeze out a few more fps. What else can they do? Shift the flightdeck?      Reducing the number of polygons from the flightdeck would decrease their advantage - graphics-wise - over "other" developers.

This is refreshing to see this post without bashing CS. I have enjoyed all their products and like all companies they too have a limit on what FSX or 2004 will except for code to make these products. As you can see I don't post often but have been buying and checking this board for the past few years. I've had good luck with the 777 as well as their 767,757,737,B52, and C130. I really can't say anything bad about them. Also, the helpful people on these boards have made it easy for me to find an answer to a question without having to post. Just my 2 cents. Thank you, Brian    

packers101 wrote on Mar 18^th, 2013 at 10:42pm:


With this last phrase you are implying that people giving their opinion about this aircraft that includes critism , like I did too, do not have patience and are far from mature.

What many of us where saying was that we hope that this aircraft can be finished completely in a reasonable time so it will live up to the advertised claims.
We also offered our help as beta testers to help.