Nice review but you are for me too positive on it. For exemple you don't mention the "small" problems like the non simulation of the EPR settings who are very important on a real 727.

but anyway, nice review

hope i don't hurt you, that was just a feeling. For me ths EPR and engines settings are important, for others, no So it's just my point of view and I'm agreed with what Tim Capps said regarding the review of the 757.

I didn't know that was your first review- good job mate 

My 757 review for AVSIM is still sitting on the editor's "desk" so I am acutely aware of the challenges reviewers face, especially on controversial products. I know it sounds ridiculous to call a toy airplane "controversial," but the flight sim community can be strange.

It is of epic length since there was so much bad forum buzz I figured I needed to address the complaints and either confirm, say I couldn't reproduce, or give a workaround.  That's probably why I haven't heard back from him 

Evidently the last AVSIM review of the 757 caused rioting, with 767 cultists burning cars in the streets.

Plus, I'm a trial lawyer, so I feel the necessity of proving everything.  "The 757 stands accused of single-digit frame rates.  Ladies and gentlement of the jury, I invite your attention to exhibits A, B, and C.  You can see for yourself in these screen shots at KMIA, I am getting 20 FPS with a very long line of traffic ahead of it."

If anything, the 727 is even better, or maybe it just seems that way because completing a flight with radio navigation and bringing her in by hand is just such a rush.  I would not have guessed that was your first review, either.