Visit Captain Sim web site  
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

 

Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
 10 Lou Hi, (Read 8839 times)
asanal
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 522
Location: Flemington,NJ  USA
Joined: Jul 9th, 2009
Gender: Male
Lou Hi,
Jun 14th, 2013 at 11:10pm
Print Post  
Lou, I saw in your post signature , you have Samsung 40" monitor.
I am trying to purchase a big monitor, but I really cannot identify which  model is the best for FSX/P3D . Will you please advise which Samsung model I should select it.
Thanks Smiley
Ahmet
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1611
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #1 - Jun 15th, 2013 at 1:29am
Print Post  
Hi Ahmet,

This is an old 40" Samsung LCD 720 60Hz T.V.

It does a fine job with FSX. I also have a 55" Samsung 1080 P LED and it looks just about the same, only bigger.  Roll Eyes

I got them at a local Cosco on sale. I use the HDMI connection and it really looks good.

A while back I looked at one of those really high res 2,560x1,440-pixel resolution monitors, but the price is still way too high for what you get. The Samsung SyncMaster S27B970 lists for around $1,200. I think that's a lot for a 27" screen when these 40" T.V.'s are going for well under $500. I believe CS built the plane resolution for the high end monitors. Just wait a bit and the price will come down.

I tried multi-screens of two and three but prefer the large single.

Lou
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
asanal
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 522
Location: Flemington,NJ  USA
Joined: Jul 9th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #2 - Jun 15th, 2013 at 2:07am
Print Post  
Thanks for your info. I will wait. If you find an ideal monitor, will you please inform me.
Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #3 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 1:29pm
Print Post  
I think it helps to point out the technical differences between big TV screens and computer monitors. This also explains why the price is different.  Wink Screen size alone isn't what makes up a good screen.

We forgot to mention one vital value called dots per inch, dpi. It defines how many pixels (dots) per inch make up the actual picture. Ever looked at the Apple 'retina' displays or the latest mobile phones with dpi in the 400+ ranges? Looks pretty sharp, huh? Well, it is  Cheesy and that's what makes it more expensive (among other things). For instance, the latest 4.7 or 5 inch mobile screens incorporate a resolution of 'full HD', which is the same as a 40 inch TV screen may give you, on a much smaller area. Same goes for computer monitors in another quotient though.

So the difference is the area at which those pixels generate the picture, leading to a sharp impression, or not. Does that mean that a modern TV screen isn't sharp? No, but it's way less sharp than a 24-27 inch computer monitor or the mentioned mobile screens with the same display resolution.

This doesn't harm the impression when watching TV, fast images, movement, scenery, but you will see a lot of difference when working with text or gauges. Again, the TV isn't unsharp but it's worlds apart from working on a proper computer monitor. To get rid of this downside, you would have to step away (literally) from the 'low-res' TV screen, which then causes the big picture to become smaller in comparison. You don't sit directly in front of a 40 inch screen, do you?

Therefore, a big screen is just one part of the puzzle when it comes to displaying information. Reading text, gauges and documents of all kind are better off with a computer screen, while the big sport events, films or videos of course come in nicely on large screen setups. For those things, even high-res beamers may be great and worth a shot. Getting really big!  Cheesy

The bigger the screen gets (while the resolution stays the same) the lower the dpi will get as less pixels per inch will cover the actual screen area. Take an average 24 inch monitor supporting full HD, 1920*1200 resolutions. It will give you 'sharp' ~95dpi while a TV screen with 40 inch and the same resolution only offers 57dpi. That's a 40% loss in sharpness.  Shocked By the way, this may explain why the TV and home cinema folks now head for the so called 4K standard, offering higher resolutions on big screens, therefore getting rid of the low dpi problem.


To conclude, the sharpest and biggest you may currently get are the 27 inch (sometimes 30) computer monitors offering resolutions up to 2560x1440. A 30 inch screen then comes in at ~98dpi, so it's as sharp as a smaller 24 inch monitor with 1920x1200 resolution. And, that much is true, those screens aren't really cheap.  Undecided
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
btscott
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 458
Joined: Dec 26th, 2009
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #4 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 2:11pm
Print Post  
This is the one I want!! 2560x1600!!

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2417347,00.asp

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1611
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #5 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 3:30pm
Print Post  
Bruce,

How are you making out with the fires?
Hope all is OK!

Lou
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
btscott
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 458
Joined: Dec 26th, 2009
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #6 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 4:56pm
Print Post  
Hi Lou!!

Fires are no direct threat to us, thanks for asking! We did have a couple days of very smokey air and the entire city was advised to stay indoors. That Black Forest fire is the closest one to Denver and is now about 75% contained. Over 500 homes lost and that number is growing.

Hope your cruise lecture sessions went well this past winter!!

Bruce
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1611
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #7 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 7:07pm
Print Post  
The wife and I had a great time...

Did 50 days at sea, in four cruises. Good way to get away from winter.



Lou

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #8 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 7:12pm
Print Post  
btscott wrote on Jun 18th, 2013 at 2:11pm:
This is the one I want!! 2560x1600!!
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2417347,00.asp

Count me in.  Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
btscott
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 458
Joined: Dec 26th, 2009
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #9 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 7:30pm
Print Post  
50 days at sea!!! You must have gained 25lbs!! Did they pick up your Manhattan tab too??  Grin

We just finished a 10 night Princess Alaska cruise. Had 2 days of very rough seas ex SFO and missed JNU as a result. I did get a ride on a Beaver in Ketchican which was the highlight of the trip!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEwwKRhxyk0


CoolP

I think you should get that monitor and let us know what you think!!  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1611
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #10 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 8:06pm
Print Post  
Did not gain any weight, but it was very hard. A lot of walking around the top deck!  Shocked

Yes indeed, the drinks tab .... ouch!

Cool video, is that ORBX and REX scenery?  Grin
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
asanal
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 522
Location: Flemington,NJ  USA
Joined: Jul 9th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #11 - Jun 18th, 2013 at 10:34pm
Print Post  
btscott wrote on Jun 18th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
50 days at sea!!! You must have gained 25lbs!! Did they pick up your Manhattan tab too??  Grin

We just finished a 10 night Princess Alaska cruise. Had 2 days of very rough seas ex SFO and missed JNU as a result. I did get a ride on a Beaver in Ketchican which was the highlight of the trip!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEwwKRhxyk0


CoolP

I think you should get that monitor and let us know what you think!!  Smiley



+1 Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #12 - Jun 19th, 2013 at 11:33am
Print Post  
btscott wrote on Jun 18th, 2013 at 7:30pm:
I think you should get that monitor and let us know what you think!!  Smiley

A friend of mine runs the predecessor of it and I must say it's impressive, especially the actual desktop size being available. You are gaining approx 80% over 'full HD'.  Cheesy But, honestly, I think my current office layout won't allow for such a huge screen as I can't adjust the distance between keyboard/mouse and the screen.

So it's more of a dream constellation for me, adding to the fact that serious gaming with such resolutions would require some beefy graphic cards in other games than FSX. Going 2560x1600 with antialiasing and full details asks for cards like a GTX780 (or more), depending on the title.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
btscott
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 458
Joined: Dec 26th, 2009
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #13 - Jun 19th, 2013 at 3:22pm
Print Post  
I just read a few very recent buyer reviews on the Amazon site and they weren't very positive -- some failures. Don't think I'll be getting this monitor anytime soon! One reviewer said it needed a good GPU, but nobody else mentioned it. Not sure if my GTX580 would run it or not.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CoolP
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 2568
Joined: Jan 17th, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou Hi,
Reply #14 - Jun 19th, 2013 at 5:06pm
Print Post  
Good point on the GPU. Perhaps not so much when only playing FSX since high resolutions mainly eat up VRAM and should work fine with the GPU powers. But if you would like to play modern shooters with 60fps or so, the GTX580 might struggle with the native resolution of the screen. So, for those cases, a GPU upgrade may indeed be a good idea for a Battlefield3 player or the latest Crysis and things. As said, FSX itself might be ok with the GPU of yours, although one would have to check if the 1.5gb VRAM or your card are sufficient at 2560x1600. Later cards come with 2, 4 or even 6gb, so that's a bit of a buffer.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board  ^Top