CAPTAIN SIM FORUM - Airbus A380

(UTC)


	Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

CAPTAIN SIM FORUM › General › Hangar talks › Airbus A380

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Page Index Toggle

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Airbus A380 (Read 19946 times)

Caribflyer Senior Member Offline Posts: 410 Joined: Jun 24^th, 2010 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #15 - Jun 20^th, 2012 at 10:32pm	Print Post
	NextlevelSimulation is doing an A380 and as for A320s well another company is doing one and I doubt anyone will top that....CaptainSim need not waste their time on an airbus when there are Dc-10s,L1011s,747 Classics and DC-8s to be made

	Marlon Carter
	IP Logged

windplayer Senior Member Offline Posts: 568 Location: Izhevsk, Udmurtia, Russia Joined: Aug 5^th, 2011 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #16 - Jun 20^th, 2012 at 10:38pm	Print Post
	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyvY2GK9B3M - vodka burner rolling What a takeoff


	Skype/VoIP ICQ IP Logged

AirCanadaGuy Ex Member	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #17 - Jun 20^th, 2012 at 11:39pm	Print Post
	Once again I second that Boeing and Douglas classics remain a priority (perhaps even a Lockheed??? ) Jesus C***** is RIGHT with that takeoff.... nearly a right off... Nice vids there Windy!


	IP Logged

Caribflyer Senior Member Offline Posts: 410 Joined: Jun 24^th, 2010 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #18 - Jun 20^th, 2012 at 11:52pm	Print Post
	a 747 Classic series would only be successful if it surpasses the RFP747 in terms of its systems. Then I would suggest the DC-8 or DC-10 ..and finally the L1011.

	Marlon Carter
	IP Logged

windplayer Senior Member Offline Posts: 568 Location: Izhevsk, Udmurtia, Russia Joined: Aug 5^th, 2011 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #19 - Jun 21^st, 2012 at 12:55pm	Print Post
	+1 L1011 a kinda forgotten by many thats unfair.


	Skype/VoIP ICQ IP Logged

AndrewL Full Member Offline Posts: 20 Location: Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire Joined: Jun 21^st, 2012	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #20 - Jun 22^nd, 2012 at 6:59am	Print Post
	LOLcakes wrote on Jun 13^th, 2012 at 12:19pm: I dont really care about the A380, but there seems to be a lack of decent A320 and A330's in the FSX community. If CS made one, they would fill in that empty spot, just like they did for the 777. Please consider it CaptainSim, Im stuck with flying the WilcoAirbus one and trust me its very very disappointing. CLS has made an A330, it looks good, but many of its systems are not simulated and is very simple to fly. FeelThere's A330 is more realistic to fly but not as nice to look at as CLS's.


	IP Logged

Pvjinflight Full Member Offline Posts: 156 Joined: Jan 2^nd, 2012	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #21 - Jun 23^rd, 2012 at 10:37am	Print Post
	Yeah 747 classic is what I would like to see first, CS 727 with proper third party fixes is good enough already, CS shouldn't waste time on improving it more when we are completely missing many great classic airliners. This would be my priority list: 1. 747 Classic, 747-100 and 200 as base pack, then cargo version, -300, 747SP and maybe some military versions too. 2. DC-8, maybe first variants as base back and later as expansions, + of course cargo version. 3. DC-10, there is really not that big differences in outside of different models, so maybe all pax versions as base pack and then cargo and tanker versions as expansions. 4. L1011, maybe those bigger versions as base pack and then -500 + cargo versions as expansion. 5. Il-76, only ones are from FS9 and really don't work well at all with FSX, myself I had to make custom 2D panel with fs panel studio to be able to enjoy one.


	IP Logged

AirCanadaGuy Ex Member	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #22 - Jun 23^rd, 2012 at 12:34pm	Print Post
	Well it looks like CS will be in business for a long time to come. I would like to see the L-1011 before the DC-10 though...


	IP Logged

LOU Beta Team Offline 727,707,747,757,767= 40years of Boeings Posts: 1611 Location: Central PA, USA Joined: Mar 3^rd, 2010 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #23 - Jun 23^rd, 2012 at 5:00pm	Print Post
	Yes, I know I'm ... My 2 cents... I would like to see CS do a KC-135 AI plane that would fly the old oil burner routes so you could join up and re-fuel. It would be great fun to try to re-fuel the Air Force one model or the C-130 or the FA-18, or even the J-3 It would be a first for CS and I believe a winner. � Lou Uploaded with ImageShack.us

	Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro \| 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 \| WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
	IP Logged

windplayer Senior Member Offline Posts: 568 Location: Izhevsk, Udmurtia, Russia Joined: Aug 5^th, 2011 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #24 - Jun 23^rd, 2012 at 6:58pm	Print Post
	Wow! Thats a really fresh idea. Nobody even thought that way... That could be a good pack, but not AI KC-135 alone. CS already did weapon for FSX, so it could be another "out of stereotype" addon introducing Military\Spec operations like refueling, surveillance, photo-recon. AI tankers, Hi-Res photo\video camera, radar, water tanker could be in one pack. KC-135 and C-130 fire fighter can be separate packs. Also, working AWACS, VATSIM\IVAO ATC software compatible - could be super great. Because there is no way to simulate ATC from the plane in this networks, and most of ATC controllers in VATSIM are pilots themselves. Speaking about online flying. There is a lot of events going on in VATSIM\IVAO, but there is no way to simulate search\rescue operations, and so on because of: 1- there is no AWACS 2- because no basis for that kind of operations. No AI boats needed to be found\ rescued, no fire in forests, no volcanoes, no hight politicians meetings with closed airspaces and fighters patrolling, no �nothing. All the events are - fly there, or fly this route, we will provide full-ATC. There is definitely place to improve. So if make AI tanker, why not to fill that gap like with weapon for FSX, and create entire basis for that kind of activities.


	Skype/VoIP ICQ IP Logged

AirCanadaGuy Ex Member	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #25 - Jun 23^rd, 2012 at 11:45pm	Print Post
	I wonder how a J-3 would react to heavy wake turbulence LOL well make sure the KC-135 comes with an extendable boom!!!!


	IP Logged

Markoz CS Team Offline Posts: 12445 Location: Victoria, Australia Joined: Apr 24^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #26 - Jun 24^th, 2012 at 3:49am	Print Post
	Hmmmm. A KC-135 flying a very low and very very slow! I'll fly the J-3 please.

	Mark Fletcher PC: i7 10700K @3.8/5.1GHz \| 64GB DDR4 3200 \| 12GB RTX 4070 Super \| 32" LCD Monitor \| 1TB SSD + 2TB SSD + 2TB HDD \| Win 11 Pro
	IP Logged

Franham Full Member Offline Posts: 9 Location: Brasil Joined: Jun 20^th, 2012 Gender:	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #27 - Jun 27^th, 2012 at 7:18pm	Print Post
	I would like to see 747 ( with complete cabin sure ).....


	IP Logged

Cappy Senior Member Offline Moar fuel please Posts: 375 Location: United States of Australia Joined: Apr 17^th, 2010	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #28 - Jul 2^nd, 2012 at 1:56pm	Print Post
	VC-10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrGAaUqGbn0 Fantastic childhood memories of BOAC/BA using them. They're still going and I'm old!

	Sent from my old flip phone thingy using Tapatalk HD_2016
	IP Logged

AirCanadaGuy Ex Member	Re: Airbus A380 Reply #29 - Jul 2^nd, 2012 at 2:16pm	Print Post
	VC-10 - ugly but very very pretty Too bad though I don't think it's in very high demand???


	IP Logged

Page Index Toggle

Pages: 1 [2] 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Board Index ‹ Board ^Top

CAPTAIN SIM FORUM » Powered by YaBB 2.6.0!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge