Visit Captain Sim web site  
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 126 127 [128]  Send TopicPrint
 25 Lou - STORIES (Read 786757 times)
Markoz
CS Team
*
Offline



Posts: 12052
Location: Victoria, Australia
Joined: Apr 24th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1905 - Jan 1st, 2021 at 2:15pm
Print Post  
Okay. I started the reinstall, of MSFS at 2030 (8:30pm 01/01/2021), a total of 107.69GB, and it finished at about 0040 (12:40am 02/01/2021). So it took 4 hours and 10 minutes to install it.
BUT... At  one point, during the install (at about 2330), while I was playing Cyberpunk 2077, and it froze on me. MSFS and CP 2077 were fighting each other for computer resources, so I had to exit the game (CP 2077). It took CP 2077 quite a while to shut down, and I was left with the game's main menu screen visible for about 5-10 minutes, unable to switch to anything else, including the desktop.

I still don't understand why it takes you 7 hours for you to get to 30GB, but I do know that MSFS takes far too long to reinstall. I have other games, that can be around 80+GB, and I can  usually download/install them in about 30-60 minutes, so MSFS at 108GB, shouldn't really take much more than an hour or two to install.
  

Mark Fletcher



PC: i7 10700K @3.8/5.1GHz | 64GB DDR4 3200 | 8GB RTX 2070 | 27" LCD Monitor | 1TB SSD & 2x2TB SSD | Win 10 Pro 64 - FSX/FSX-SE/P3D3/P3D4/P3D5/MSFS2020
15.6" Gaming Laptop: i7 7700HQ | 32GB DDR4 | 6GB GTX 1060 | 256GB SSD & 1TB HDD | Win 10 Pro 64bit - FSX-SE/P3D4
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1575
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1906 - Feb 9th, 2021 at 3:19pm
Print Post  
Hi Mark,

Hope all is well with you both!
I sent you an e-mail a while back and wonder if you received it?

When I re-installed the MSFS-2020 it was a lot faster because the install did not load any planes or airports even though I bought the premium version.  So I just loaded the planes I really like and a few of the airports just to see how it would work.  My favorite planes is the Cessna 172.  It seems to fly pretty much as the real plane more so than some of the other planes.  I bought one of the ad-on planes the Carenado YMF-5.  I don't think it flies anything like the real WACO planes I used to fly.  I really like the A2A planes and wish they would have some of them available.  I downloaded the Friday Harbor airport, but I liked the Orbx version for FSX better. 

It would be fun to fly formation some time!

Lou
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1575
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1907 - Feb 16th, 2021 at 1:55pm
Print Post  
Before I retired back in 2005, I always loved to fly visual approaches.  When I was still flying the Boeing 727 back in the dark ages, you really had to keep up with the beast.  The 727 and the 747 were great fun flying something like the visual to RW 13L at JFK, also the Expressway Visual to RW 31 at LGA was fun in the 727.  So after retirement, I was thrilled to fly the CS 727 and re-live all those fun landings.  Then CS comes out with the 757.  This was and still is my favorite plane to fly.  The CS 757 flies just like the real plane and the cockpit is as real as it gets.

If you want to have some fun, download the River Visual to RW 19 at DCA.
https://skyvector.com/files/tpp/2101/pdf/00443RIVER_VIS19.PDF

Flying this approach in the CS 757 is one of my favorite maneuvers.  You can try it with any of the CS planes like the 727, 737 or the C-130 - all will keep you busy and teach you how to manage the plane with out using the autopilot.  When you get pretty good at hand flying the 757, try adding some weather like rain or a crosswind. 

Great fun indeed!

Stay safe  Cool
Lou
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Tim Capps
Senior Member
*
Offline


Defense Lawyer & US Navy
JAG (ret), Writer

Posts: 1069
Location: Southern Illinois
Joined: May 21st, 2009
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1908 - Feb 17th, 2021 at 8:13pm
Print Post  
LOU wrote on Feb 16th, 2021 at 1:55pm:
the River Visual to RW 19 at DCA


Smiley  I saw that one in an article written by a pilot called something like, "Approaches Passengers Should Avoid." Pretty sensationalized, I suspect, but perhaps things are a little trickier nowadays than pre--911 times?

But, yes, that is a really fun one. I found out the hard way about the offset localizer at JFK in one night flight in the L1011. The approaches approaches are the best part of flying, although SIDS keep you busy, too, especially in the old airplanes, relying on radio navigation. I bet you appreciated two extra heads and sets of hands!
  

PC: i9 10900K @ 3.8 GHz | 32GB DDR4 3200 | 10GB RTX 3080 | 32” Asus TUF VG32VQ Curved Monitor | Samsung 2TB SSD HD | Win 10 Pro 64 - Flight Sim P3Dv5.2 |
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JayG
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 329
Joined: Jan 12th, 2007
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1909 - Feb 28th, 2021 at 5:37am
Print Post  
LOU wrote on Feb 16th, 2021 at 1:55pm:
Then CS comes out with the 757.  This was and still is my favorite plane to fly.  The CS 757 flies just like the real plane and the cockpit is as real as it gets.


Ditto on the 757! I hope it's not too long before it's available in FS 2020
  

Flight Lead: "Bandits at 3 oclock!!!"&&Wingman: "It's only 2:30 now, what do we do til then?"
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1575
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1910 - Feb 28th, 2021 at 9:29pm
Print Post  
Jay, that would be wonderful.
Could you imagine you and me flying formation in the CS-757?

TRAFIC, TRAFIC - PULL-UP!  Grin
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1575
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1911 - Mar 16th, 2021 at 3:28pm
Print Post  
I've been playing around with the CS 757-300.  Although I never flew the -300 it flies pretty much as does the -200.  I spent some time looking around the cockpit and the level of detail is fantastic.  Small things like the worn look of the speed brake handle from being touched by the greasy paws of the pilots, or the coffee cup stains on the center console right where it says NO LIQUIDS!  Grin

Speaking of coffee cups, the coffee cup in the pilots side cup holder can disappear with a click.  Pretty cool!  I'm sure you all know you can move your view around by clicking the right button on the mouse and dragging left, right, up or down and then zoom in or out with the mouse wheel.

Of course I remember my first CS plane the 727.  The detail of the worn parts in the cockpit was exactly as I remember it in the real cockpit. 

When I was a simulator instructor in the early 70's as well as line pilot and FAA check airman I would have loved to have this level of reality in our multi-million dollar simulators. I watched the visuals in these high-end simulators go from fuzzy TV scenery which was generated with a wall map which was 25 feet high by over a 100 feet long where a vidicon camera moved along the wall on a crane to produce an image of a single runway that was sent to a TV monitor in the cockpit window of the simulator. Then years later to computer generated sets of light dots on the simulator cockpit windows which was not much better and even when I retired in 2005, the level of scenery was nothing compared to what I can see in P3D or other platforms.

Fellow Sim pilots, enjoy the ride!
Stay safe  Wink
Lou
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JayG
Senior Member
*
Offline



Posts: 329
Joined: Jan 12th, 2007
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1912 - Mar 28th, 2021 at 1:30am
Print Post  
LOU wrote on Feb 28th, 2021 at 9:29pm:
Jay, that would be wonderful.
Could you imagine you and me flying formation in the CS-757?

TRAFIC, TRAFIC - PULL-UP!  Grin


Sounds like a plan Lou! One of two things need to happen first though.....either I need to re-install 300gigs of FSX or CS needs to get the 75 into FS2020!  I prefer #2 Smiley
  

Flight Lead: "Bandits at 3 oclock!!!"&&Wingman: "It's only 2:30 now, what do we do til then?"
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1575
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1913 - Jul 8th, 2021 at 2:29pm
Print Post  
Captains,

It was always fun to have to do crosswind landings - for real - in the 707, 727 or 747.  Each one of these planes had to land with wings level since the engines on the 707 or 747 could hit the ground if the wings were not level.  The 727 needed to keep the wings level so as not to drag the outboard leading edge flaps.  In order to make a successful crosswind landing in these planes the pilot would need to "crab" into the wind during the landing. 

Establishing the correct crab angle was not too hard, but as the wind speed and angle would change as the plane descended, the pilot would be making constant corrections to the crab angle to keep the plane lined-up with the runway.  The critical part of the landing was the flare to touchdown.  The 707 & 747 had big wings and lower wing loading than the 727 so the flare was not as difficult as the 727.  In the 707 & 747 you could just hold the crab with wings level until just the last second before the wheels would touch.  At that point the pilot would use the rudder to take out the crab while keeping the wings level with the ailerons as the wheels touched.  In fact in the 747 there were so many main wheels that even if you were late taking out the crab the drag of the landing gear would bring the nose of the plane around while leaving a bunch of rubber on the runway. 

The 727 on the other hand was a bit more difficult to land in a crosswind because of the higher wing loading. In the 727 you would fly at a slightly higher airspeed and add some thrust as you started the flare and brought the nose in line with the runway since in reality this maneuver was really a side slip and lift would be lost.  This was not as big a deal in the 707 &747, but in the 727 if you did not add power the plane would smack down hard on the runway and sometimes give you a "rubber jungle" in the cabin as a lot of the Oxygen masks would fall out of the overhead compartments.  If ever that would happen, we would make the Flight Engineer stand at the cockpit door an say good-by to the passengers.  Smiley 

The 757 on the other hand would land in a side slip since the engines were much higher off the ground and keeping the wing down was not a problem.  In fact the 757/767 autopilot would automatically transition to a side slip at 500 feet AGL while doing an auto-land.

One evening landing in Las Vegas in the 757 we had a 25 knot crosswind and the autopilot did a really nice job of slicking on the landing.  At 500 feet on the approach the autopilot brought the nose to line-up with the runway while lowering the wing into the wind. As the flare was started the wing was kept down on the up-wind side and on touchdown, even the spoilers would deploy at a slower rate since only the upwind truck was touching the runway first because the wing on the upwind side was down to slip the plane sideways into the wind.  Really nice system.

Stay well, and keep flying!

Lou  Smiley
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LOU
Beta Team
*
Offline


727,707,747,757,767=
40years of Boeings

Posts: 1575
Location: Central PA, USA
Joined: Mar 3rd, 2010
Gender: Male
Re: Lou - STORIES
Reply #1914 - Aug 30th, 2021 at 4:43pm
Print Post  
If you are going to try a three autopilot landing (auto land) in the 757 or 767 remember to be configured for landing before reaching 1,500 feet AGL since the autopilots go through a check that ends at 1,500 AGL and will display a green flag in the autopilot panel on both pilot instrument panels only if the plane is fully configured.  If the check goes well it will display in green - LAND THREE.  It can also display LAND TWO if one of the autopilots does not pass the test but it can still make an auto land. If there is a fail of the test or the aircraft is not configured properly it will display NO AUTO LAND.

You should try to have the aircraft fully configured (gear, flaps & speed) for landing before reaching 1,500 if using auto land and 1,000 if hand flying.  Don't forget to enter the approach airspeed in the computer by pushing the INIT REF button and confirming the final speed by entering the flap setting and speed.

Hope you all are stay safe...
Keep flying,

Lou  Cool
  

Processor: Intel Core i7-4770k @3.5Ghz Memory: 6Gb DDR3 1600mhz Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Storage: 256Gb Samsung 840 Pro | 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 | WD Black 640Gb 7200rpm 55" Samsung LED - HDTV for monitor
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 126 127 [128] 
Send TopicPrint
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board  ^Top