IMO both planes are very similar. It's a case of whether you prefer the 767-300 with it's range of ~6000nm or the 757-200 with it's range ~3600nm. If you prefer long haul flights then the 767 does it. I have done many 12+ hour flights in the 767-300 (and the 767-200, range ~6500nm, which is my favourite) and a lot of 6-7 hour flights in the 757-200.

I hope you find this information helpful in making a decision.

Note: Either way I don't think you will be disappointed.

Mark

I have both planes. I prefer the 767 simply because the speedbrakes are more effective. I can leave the plane in the LNAV and VNAV down to about 4-5000 ASL. The 757 I have to disengage VNAV and start the descent using V/S. I don't know if it is a problem with the model or my installation. Whatever, they are both great planes. You would enjoy a 767.

Michael Cubine

I have both - 757 and 767. If you need long-haul aircraft, you should definitely buy 767. I use 757 for short and medium routes. 767 is much better for transatlantic hauls. Both planes have the same cockpits, so there is not much to learn. I'm 100% satisfied with my 757 and 767. Both are great add-ons for FSX.

Regards

PK

The 767 has a longer range, and has different options on the overhead. It all really depends on what kind of flying you do imo, but I enjoy both planes.