Hello everybody, I'm new on this forum.

I bought CS 727 and I think it's an outstanding product. Now I'm considering the purchase of CS 767 (it looks great!) and I have one question: What about the frame rates in 767? Is it working as good as 727?

I found some info about it here, but there wasn't any info about the computer's hardware. I'm using Apple iMac with Windows Vista, 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, GeForce 8800GT 512MB, 4GB RAM. Would the 767 work fine?

I'm looking forward to hearing from you

Well let's not say "as good" please, since it is pretty resource demanding.

hochwang wrote on Jul 15^th, 2009 at 1:20pm:


I heard that 757 from CS in FSX doesn't work smooth. Is the 767 worse?!

//please compare it to 727 because I don't have 757.

Please help me. This is beautiful aircraft, but I must consider this purchase - I don't want to lose my money.

When I reveiwed the 757 at AVSIM I posted pictures of me getting 20-ish FPS at KMIA with the 757 at "High" scenery option, medium airport traffic and 70% Traffic X.  I have a consumer grade computer from Best Buy.

Some people say frame rates are bad, but they're not.  You are just going to have pay for the unparalled visuals.  That means knowing your system, working with it, and coming up with the best compromise between performance and looks.  If you have an older system, you're probably going to have to make more compromises.  The nice thing about FSX is that it has rendered the old fixation on FPS less useful, because you can stil get very smooth performance with relatively low frame rates.