To me, the 777 is very rushed, has cool features and textures, but systems and other items are quite poor, Doors don't work and ground Vehicles don't lineup, these can easily be fixed by the dev or a third party, but so far I'm quite disappointed in how a £30 aircraft doesn't have functioning doors and has GENX engine sounds.

6/10 for me. But can certainly be improved :-/

Toby Cook wrote on May 17^th, 2021 at 12:29pm:

these can easily be fixed

All that can easily be fixed will be fixed.
Feel free to post such items in the wish list and/or bug tracking sections.

I almost buy it, thank good I saw this forum.

Let me know when it has open doors... this is a must! and it seems Asobo started a disorder that others might follow.

Make no mistake, the community recognize you products because they meet superb attention to details. Keep it that way.

Well the weights are all off for a 777, any plans to rectify that?

bryer wrote on May 17^th, 2021 at 3:11pm:

the weights are all off for a 777

https://www.captainsim.org/forum/csf.pl?num=1621237231

Captainsim has a huge potential for it!
the engines indicators parameters from 747 wasn`t nice to displayed, at least from the 787 parameters.
but that`s okay, can be update further for sure!
some physics during the running for take-off and landing approach can be as well!
the graphics and performances going well soo far!
first steep done!


   

Captain Sim wrote on May 17^th, 2021 at 3:56pm:

bryer wrote on May 17th, 2021 at 3:11pm: the weights are all off for a 777 https://www.captainsim.org/forum/csf.pl?num=1621237231

You want me to submit a bug report for your product for the basics of it?

Google search 777-200ER and look at the weights, then compare it to your "747" weights in the aircraft_config file. No wonder it takes so long to get airbourne, 2 engines trying to shift 747 weight.

Tobi Cook ??? Where is the soundpak for the GE90 engines ?? 777 ?