CAPTAIN SIM FORUM
777 Captain (32-bit) >> 777 Captain (32bit) - General >> What were the reasons for not Including RR?
https://www.captainsim.org/forum/csf.pl?num=1359122910

Message started by froggy on Jan 25th, 2013 at 2:08pm

Title: Re: What were the reasons for not Including RR?
Post by 0815 on Jan 25th, 2013 at 11:40pm

Captain Sim wrote on Jan 25th, 2013 at 9:32pm:
Ok, let's see how many people will vote. Possibly we'll build one.


You can not make such a beautiful 777 and then leave out the Rolls Royce engines. It would be a shame to your work if you do not make the RR engines.

have a heart for all fans of American Airlines, Singapore Airlines, British Airways, Transaero and many more that use the Trent 800.

This is about whether you have implemented the entire 777 series or just a portion. Without RR, it is only a part, but all with RR engines.

I really hope you do it because it would be a shame if you would not complete this series.

Give us the 777-200ER with Trent 895.

8-)

CAPTAIN SIM FORUM » Powered by YaBB 2.6.0!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.