I dont know if you have used fsuipc to checke the continuos stream of garbage cs767 sends to fsx.

Its so much, and so fast that i am certain that cs767 will be more, if not much more framerate friendly once the bug is fixed.


The frames you get with cs767 is just too low, and i seriously suspect this contstant stream of useless messages has got to do with the low fps we get with this plane.

As for Rex2 i tried it , and its bugs  led to full fsx reinstall for me, so  i went back to rex1. i use rex only for textures and ASA for weather.

ASA is a great very intuitive easy to use WX program for FSX, i wouldnt even consider rex in place of it.

That said REx2 will be great if they made the GUI less confusing, and remove the bugs that make you the user, feel like a beta tester.


And never trust anything anybody tells you on avsim either, its run by a bunch of crooks that are always pretending to be fellow simmers, infact avsim is full of people giving great reviews about buggy to hell products.

ASA is 1 million times better than REX2 anytime, infact there is no competition. But rex textures are also worth the money, as for the rex weather engine, its just too buggy and confusing.