Then it's a terrible idea in my opinion.

I'm not sure many people investing in addons (and let's be fair $30 isn't *that* cheap right now) actually want great visuals when they are combined with very poorly implemented and broken base systems.

You know as well as I do that the Asobo avionics are broken and will remain broken for an extended period. Our best hope is that the working title guys will fix it /eventually/ in the official side of things but that could be years since the CJ4 and Garmin systems are their priority for now.

If the Asobo code worked ok, you might've been on to something. Now you're in the midst of controversy because you've disappointed everyone half-way serious about simming. Unless you want to do extremely casual flying and care for the looks only, This plane is pretty useless.

It can't even reliably do a direct-to, so using Vatsim, IVAO or any other real-person ATC is out the window.

It can't open the exterior doors so Self-Loading Cargo doesn't work with it.

It identifies as a 748 so economy sims (e.g. OnAir) don't work properly with it.

All of the ground vehicles don't align properly so it looks bad at the gate too.

And since it's using 748 specs for a lot of things, a simbrief plan will be all kinds of wrong.

Some of these can be fixed with quick config edits so I hope they're all on your to-do list, but without functioning avionics it's never going to be useful for anyone using the 'real' ATC services.

So like I said, if you can't or won't "fix" it.. then it's going to have to depend on the community to do so and it really undermines your credibility as a maker of addons.

I guess I can forgive you for an idea that didn't work out but for darn sure I will be very skeptical of any further addons you release.