Peter and CoolP randomly discuss and talk nonesense.

Concerning the 'a second Lou thread plan', does it make a difference if you click on page 37 or so or on page 1 when you can read the same things? I always click on the last answer given, so I'll land on the right one either way.
So, yeah, go ahead on a second thread, but I think the limiting factors may just be the very same, good and bad.

Edited.

Starting on assumptions, the 747-8Fs are still parked?

Well because Qatar Airways haven't gotten their 787 delivery resolution yet, we won't know when Cargolux will take delivery; Qatar owns 35% of Cargolux, and no one shareholder has a controlling stake, so...

Anyways, Nippon Cargo Airlines (NAC) will be taking delivery second, but if Cargolux doesn't take theirs first, NAC will theirs.


POST #767!!!!

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5092/5388464352_5febf89545_b.jpg
^^Boeing 767-400ER of Delta Air Lines in Breat Cancer Awareness livery. The plane Captain Sim needs to do!!

And the Atlas Air guys? They don't have Qatar involved anywhere but still rejected some of the ordered planes.


Ok, once again sorry, Peter. I did not want to annoy you with some things regarding facts on the Concorde incident.
I just hope that you've now got the point. For example, MD wasn't sentenced, Concorde engines don't fail in pairs by design and that reading actually helps more than watching FOX News only.  :D

I was just wondering why a grown up guy states wrong assumptions with that much confidence I guess.
Could be that the actual repeat rate of that behavior is the 'wondering' factor though.


However, the -400 would indeed be nice to see, maybe the 777 development helps a bit there.

CoolP wrote on Sep 25^th, 2011 at 4:59pm:

And the Atlas Air guys? They don't have Qatar involved anywhere but still rejected some of the ordered planes. Ok, once again sorry, Peter. I did not want to annoy you with some things regarding facts on the Concorde incident. I just hope that you've now got the point. For example, MD wasn't sentenced, Concorde engines don't fail in pairs by design and that reading actually helps more than watching FOX News only.  :D I was just wondering why a grown up guy states wrong assumptions with that much confidence I guess. Could be that the actual repeat rate of that behavior is the 'wondering' factor though. However, the -400 would indeed be nice to see, maybe the 777 development helps a bit there.

Well Atlas Air backed out because of money I guess. Anyways, an airline pays for their planes along the way of building, so at a point ,if they cancel, Boeign keeps the money and seels teh plane anyways. So since Atlas was to get soem of those first one this year, my guess is Boeing will sell them at a discount from full price (but still above a -400BCF) and make double the money.

701151 wrote on Sep 25^th, 2011 at 5:30pm:

Anyways, an airline pays for their planes along the way of building, so at a point ,if they cancel, Boeign keeps the money and seels teh plane anyways. So since Atlas was to get soem of those first one this year, my guess is Boeing will sell them at a discount from full price (but still above a -400BCF) and make double the money.

Looks like another Peter's special is coming up.  :D

How about you two start your own thread.

Haha, I hear you, Lou.
Sorry, I can't hold back on some attitudes, statements and 'insights'.

But, your thread of course.  :)
Edited. Or Peter's, who knows?  ::)

LOU wrote on Sep 25^th, 2011 at 6:07pm:

How about you two start your own thread.

Its done!

Renamed this one

I wished I had that Ego.  ;D

Do you?