svache wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2009 at 10:07pm:

I agree, and not only that, there's a LOT of people who still run 2004, simply because FSX is eating too much resources. I have a new computer, with all the specs as they should be, but I am still not happy about the FSX performance, plus I got so many payware that I am not willing to switch over, and there's lots of people like us. It would be nice if they cover the other section of the market also, with a 2004 version. I'm sure it would be bought a lot.. sad to hear we're missing out on this one :(

If Captain Sim does not consider the 767 for FS2004 then they lost a customer. I really want that 767. I can not afford to fly FSX when I'm spoiled already with my FS2004 running in full capacity on my PC.

Game graphics/effects are not so important. It's always the system that makes things well.

Edited by Moderator - please follow the Forum Rules